Anti-corruption bodies have increased the pace of their work, which naturally provoked resistance from the corrupt system. The events of recent days are a clear example of this. This is the conclusion of the participants of the presentation of the NGO "Transparency International Ukraine" study on the capacity, management and interaction of the anti-corruption infrastructure held on October 29, 2020.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, which imposes criminal liability for submitting false data to e-declaration, is political. In this way, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine not only legitimizes the intentions of politicians and officials to hide from society illegally acquired wealth, but also protects the interests of some judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (under NABU investigations).
On October 27, 2020, the Detectives of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), under the procedural guidance of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor`s Office (SAPO) exposed 11 persons, who organized a corruption scheme, resulted in causing UAH 47 million losses to the Yuzhny Sea Commercial Port SE. Among the organizers of the scheme there are Acting and Former officials of the Yuzhny Sea Commercial Port SE.
The Detectives of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) under the procedural guidance of the prosecutors of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) completed a pre-trial investigation as of the facts of abuse of office by officials of Energomerezha HC PrJSC, Zaporizhzhiaoblenergo PJSC and Cherkasyoblenergo PJSC. On October 23, 2020, suspects and their defense had been granted with access to the investigation materials. Then the indictment will be drawn up and sent to court.
The investigation as of the facts of illegally received from the state budget cash compensation payments in the amount of UAH 937 thousand for renting a room in the “Kyiv” Hotel by the Member of Parliament (MP) of the VIII convocation is completed. On October 20, 2020, the suspect and his defense had been granted with access to criminal proceeding for review. His actions are qualified under Part 2 Article 364 (Abuse of authority or office) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.